NYT on WMG

TODAY’S READING ASSIGNMENT: In a solid piece headlined “Bids for Warner Suggest Faith in Industry’s Future,” Standard & Poors analyst Tuna Amobi tells N.Y. Times reporter Ben Sisario, “We’ve been a little surprised by the robust mess of this auction, given the well-chronicled problems of the music industry. It seems that the company is open to all kinds of scenarios.” As Sisario points out, while Warner and EMI’s publishing divisions are solid investments, whoever ends up with Warner’s recorded music assets will most likely want to combine it with EMI’s corresponding division, and remove hundreds of millions of dollars in operational redundancies. That would reduce the number of major global record companies from four to three, and, some say, the savings might be enough to make a combined Warner-EMI label group profitable. Stop us if you’ve heard this plotline before… (4/11a)

UMG AND TIKTOK
WORK IT OUT
The kerfuffle is in the past. (5/2a)
LUCIAN SOUNDS OFF ON UMG/TIKTOK DEAL
A breakdown from the boss (5/2a)
HITS LIST: HANGIN' OUT
With extra relish (5/3a)
LIVE NATION POSTS (ANOTHER) RECORD QUARTER
More butts in seats than ever before. (5/3a)
A POST-WALLEN AFFAIR
A dynamic duo, y'all (5/3a)
THE NEW UMG
Gosh, we hope there are more press releases.
TIKTOK BANNED!
Unless the Senate manages to make this whole thing go away, that is.
THE NEW HUGE COUNTRY ACT
No, not that one.
TRUMP'S CAMPAIGN PLAYLIST
Now 100% unlicensed!
 Email

 First Name

 Last Name

 Company

 Country
CAPTCHA code
Captcha: (type the characters above)